Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3755 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon W3550 - 130 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
