Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 1359 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 58% better in Diablo IV than Xeon W3550 - 153 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 47 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
