Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 3712 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 13% better in Remnant II than Xeon W3520 - 88 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
