Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1724 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 176 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
