Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 141 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 188 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 15 vs 45 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
