Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1724 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 24 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
