Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 1673 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 160 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
