Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 175 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Athlon 3000G - 197 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Athlon |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
