Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 699 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than EPYC 7551P - 351 vs 340 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 64 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon E | Collection | EPYC |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |