Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 3013 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 18% better in War Thunder than Xeon W3520 - 151 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 64 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
