Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3887 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon W3520 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
