Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 3571 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon W3520 - 98 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
