Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1491 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon W3520 - 152 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
