Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3571 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon W3520 - 161 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |