Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1092 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - 272 vs 266 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $59.99 vs $101.79
- Up to 42% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - $0.22 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |