Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 4049 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield V than Xeon W3520 - 248 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3592 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |