Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 4049 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon W3520 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
413
26.155794806839772%
Multi-Core
1395
22.591093117408906%
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |