Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4312 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5645 - 173 vs 162 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |