Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3536 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5645 - 118 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
