Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5645 - 338 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 24 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
