Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120T outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2120T is 537 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5645 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |