Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 497 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6350 - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 90 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |