Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 196 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 65 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
