Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Xeon E5-2630 v3 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 165 vs 163 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 85 vs 90 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
