Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Xeon E5-2667 v3 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 90 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
