Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Core i7-4702HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 469 days newer than Core i7-4702HQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-4702HQ - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702HQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702HQ
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 37 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-4702HQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702HQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
