Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 1899 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Athlon 3000G - 179 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 35 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 90 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
