Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 1025 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 3 than EPYC 7551P - 132 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 90 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 64 vs 16 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |