Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 107 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |