Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 90 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 184 vs 179 FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |