Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $136.62 vs $579.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-14900 - $0.75 vs $3.05 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 190 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
182
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Buy for $579.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |