Buy on Amazon
$136.62
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 416 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $136.62 vs $270.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.46 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Resident Evil Village than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 298 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
297
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
298
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
50%
Price, $
$270
50%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
