Buy on Amazon
$136.62
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 1365 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 176 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
170
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 9 4900H
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
