Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 295 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Ryzen 5 1400 - 201 vs 200 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 69% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $42.88 vs $136.62
- Up to 69% better value when playing Control than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.21 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
30%
Price, $
$136.62
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6108 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
200
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |