Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 255 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 7 1700 - 173 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $136.62 vs $195.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.79 vs $1.14 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |