Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3400G

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3400G: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Tie

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

3.7 GHz | 4-core

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics

Buy for $45.29 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 97 minutes ago

vs
FPS Tie

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

3.7 GHz | 4-core

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics

Buy for $45.29 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 97 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1112 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

  • Up to 67% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $45.29 vs $136.62
  • Up to 67% better value when playing Dead Space than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.3 vs $0.92 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Dead Space.
Dead Space

Dead Space

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


FPS

149

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.92/FPS

32%

Price, $

$136.62

33%

Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4

Buy for $136.62 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 97 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Logo
Ryzen 5 3400G

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


FPS

149

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.3/FPS

100%

Price, $

$45.29

100%

Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics

Buy for $45.29 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 97 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Logo
Ryzen 5 3400G

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


Single-Core

1088

96%

Multi-Core

3898

100%

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Logo
Ryzen 5 3400G

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


Single-Core

1128

100%

Multi-Core

3619

92%

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4

vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Jun 20th, 2016Release Date
Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E5CollectionRyzen 5
Broadwell-E/EPCodenamePicasso
Intel Socket 2011-3SocketAMD Socket AM4
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores4
8Threads8
3.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
140 WTDP
65 W
14 nmProcess Size
12 nm
35.0xMultiplier
37.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Radeon RX Vega 11
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Xeon E5-1620 v4 or Ryzen 5 3400G

Dead Space, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.