Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1248 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Athlon 3000G - 122 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 57% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $98.78 vs $232.12
- Up to 56% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.83 vs $1.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
43.684210526315795%
Price, $
$232.12
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3678 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
119
97.54098360655738%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3681 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
87.95955882352942%
Multi-Core
1975
50.667008722421755%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |