Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1260L outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1260L is 610 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Performs up to 9% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 22 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |