Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v2 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v2 is 407 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E3-1240 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 69 vs 80 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 69 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
