Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4702MQ outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4702MQ is 785 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1240 - 502 vs 457 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 37 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i7-4702MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
