Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1254 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 80 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E3-1240 - 118 vs 109 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
