Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1254 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 80 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Xeon E3-1240 - 180 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 12 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
