Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5350U outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5350U is 1428 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5350U
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1240 - 152 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-5350U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i5-5350U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
