Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2279 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 7% better in Apex Legends than Xeon E3-1240 - 277 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 64 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
