Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2430 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 6% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 67 vs 63 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 15 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
