Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1872 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 69 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in HITMAN 3 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 64 vs 8 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
