Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5650U outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5650U is 1021 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5650U - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 224 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 15 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
