Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 is 330 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Performs up to 0% better in Resident Evil Village than FX-6200 - 292 vs 291 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 80 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |