Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v3 is 414 days older than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than Core i3-4160T - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
