Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Core i7-4710HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v3 is 303 days older than Core i7-4710HQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-4710HQ - 128 vs 125 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 47 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i7-4710HQ
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
